****
| Sources | |
| ------------- |:-------------:| -----:|
| Video | [JPBD] |
| Audio Track 1 | [USBD] (English 2.0 TrueHD) |
| Audio Track 2 | [BDMV] (Japanese 2.0 TrueHD) |
| Audio Track 3 | [USBD] (Commentary) (en) |
| Subtitle Track 1 | Signs & Songs (en) |
| Subtitle Track 2 | Full Subtitles [MK-SCY] (en) |
| Mediainfo | https://pastebin.com/StE7QwDw |
****
**_Notes_ :** Fixed the op kfx of Jormungand Perfect Order which was lagging for some. Here's the [patch](https://files.catbox.moe/8v7d79.zip) for it.
If there are any issues you find with this release or points for improvement, post it in the comments.
Please seed my releases for as long as possible since I don’t have a seedbox.
anyone who downloads a BD remux of anime for the video quality is doing it wrong. they're basically only useful for encoders who are too lazy to download the whole BD.
lmao
>so i assume the japanese audio is actually from the US BD.
Yeah, the only company I've known to use Dolby's TrueHD is Funimation. Everyone else uses the seemingly horribly compressed DTS/HDMA or raw PCM.
>if i remember MK-SCY’s release had lots of grain
And why is that a bad thing? Its really good that they preserved it.
>anyone who downloads a BD remux of anime for the video quality is doing it wrong
Agree. But there are some rare cases where all the encodes suck(example Steins;Gate, Youjo Senki, Madoka Magica) so you have no choice but to get the ITA-BD remux.
@vikrant9760 Jormungand has enormous amounts of grains, keeping the quality of bdmv itself while encoding pretty hard.
So, JPBD's are slightly better than Beatrice-raws encodes.
@Vuats Even if that is true, some comparisons would still be appreciated since Beatrice-Raws used by SCY are properly filtered and would have taken care of other issues like aliasing, banding, ringing, etc even if they had to denoise.
Comps would help determine which tradeoff is better or worth it.
One of my all-time top 10's in anime
I think I have 4-5 versions inc some talked about here going back to horrible's release
Well, it's was worth the space and it had the graining effect etc good version
He was wrong. This has some issues like aliasing and banding which are fixed on the Beatrice/SCY encodes. Properly filtered is usually better. Only if the encodes are bad is the Remux better. And the encoders here are good.
@vikrant9760, the encodes for the shows aren't bad. They're just sourced from the inferior (mostly, since for S;G I know it has more detail but more artifacts, always a tradeoff) JPBD. The ITBD always exhibits encode-like filtering. And fyi, for S;G a JPBD/ITBD hybrid would be best and would utilize ITBD to remove artifacts and JPBD to preserve the details.
Just an update for anyone interested. This would appear to be better because it retains the grain. The encodes raped it. This is coming from an encoder. A proper encode would have to be bigger than source in order to retain all the grain.
Comments - 16
shimo
Simplistic
herkz
vikrant9760
herkz
Simplistic
Campyfire
vikrant9760
Vuats
vikrant9760
pizz001
xOmnium
HachiRokuNiSanKyu
HachiRokuNiSanKyu
HachiRokuNiSanKyu
HachiRokuNiSanKyu