[Arukoru] Go-Toubun no Hanayome (The Quintessential Quintuplets) - Episode 08 [1080p x265 10bit WEB Multi-Sub AAC]

Category:
Date:
2019-03-01 02:34 UTC
Submitter:
Seeders:
0
Information:
No information.
Leechers:
0
File size:
255.4 MiB
Completed:
391
Info hash:
608385628e56504c032816b9c8249558554f3f2d
[![Arukoru-Go-Toubun-no-Hanayome-The-Quintessential-Quintuplets.png](https://i.postimg.cc/XqRhDm1V/Arukoru-Go-Toubun-no-Hanayome-The-Quintessential-Quintuplets.png)](https://postimg.cc/ZvLVW7hg) [![Arukoru-Go-Toubun-no-Hanayome-The-Quintessential-Quintuplets.png](https://i.postimg.cc/JnGRwwxJ/Arukoru-Go-Toubun-no-Hanayome-The-Quintessential-Quintuplets.png)](https://postimg.cc/Fd5McB2s) [![Arukoru-Go-Toubun-no-Hanayome-The-Quintessential-Quintuplets.png](https://i.postimg.cc/DzNtXSQJ/Arukoru-Go-Toubun-no-Hanayome-The-Quintessential-Quintuplets.png)](https://postimg.cc/Z9r7kKM4) Format : Matroska Format version : Version 4 File size : 255 MiB Duration : 24 min 7 s Overall bit rate : 1 480 kb/s Encoded date : UTC 2019-03-01 02:28:24 Writing application : mkvmerge v29.0.0 ('Like It Or Not') 64-bit Writing library : libebml v1.3.6 + libmatroska v1.4.9 / Lavf58.20.100 Video ID : 1 Format : HEVC Format/Info : High Efficiency Video Coding Format profile : Main 10@L4@Main Codec ID : V_MPEGH/ISO/HEVC Duration : 24 min 4 s Bit rate : 1 350 kb/s Width : 1 920 pixels Height : 1 080 pixels Display aspect ratio : 16:9 Frame rate mode : Constant Frame rate : 23.976 (24000/1001) FPS Color space : YUV Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0 Bit depth : 10 bits Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.027 Stream size : 233 MiB (91%) Writing library : x265 2.9:[Windows][GCC 7.1.0][64 bit] 10bit Default : Yes Forced : No Color range : Limited Color primaries : BT.709 Transfer characteristics : BT.709 Matrix coefficients : BT.709 Audio ID : 2 Format : AAC LC Format/Info : Advanced Audio Codec Low Complexity Codec ID : A_AAC-2 Duration : 24 min 4 s Bit rate : 128 kb/s Channel(s) : 2 channels Channel layout : L R Sampling rate : 44.1 kHz Frame rate : 43.066 FPS (1024 SPF) Compression mode : Lossy Stream size : 22.0 MiB (9%) Language : Japanese Default : Yes Forced : No Text #1 ID : 3 Format : ASS Codec ID : S_TEXT/ASS Codec ID/Info : Advanced Sub Station Alpha Duration : 24 min 2 s Bit rate : 162 b/s Count of elements : 449 Compression mode : Lossless Stream size : 28.6 KiB (0%) Language : English Default : Yes Forced : Yes Text #2 ID : 4 Format : ASS Codec ID : S_TEXT/ASS Codec ID/Info : Advanced Sub Station Alpha Duration : 24 min 4 s Bit rate : 155 b/s Count of elements : 393 Compression mode : Lossless Stream size : 27.4 KiB (0%) Language : German Default : No Forced : No Text #3 ID : 5 Format : ASS Codec ID : S_TEXT/ASS Codec ID/Info : Advanced Sub Station Alpha Duration : 24 min 2 s Bit rate : 150 b/s Count of elements : 421 Compression mode : Lossless Stream size : 26.6 KiB (0%) Language : Spanish Default : No Forced : No Text #4 ID : 6 Format : ASS Codec ID : S_TEXT/ASS Codec ID/Info : Advanced Sub Station Alpha Duration : 24 min 2 s Bit rate : 150 b/s Count of elements : 421 Compression mode : Lossless Stream size : 26.6 KiB (0%) Title : Mexico Language : Spanish Default : No Forced : No Text #5 ID : 7 Format : ASS Codec ID : S_TEXT/ASS Codec ID/Info : Advanced Sub Station Alpha Duration : 24 min 2 s Bit rate : 142 b/s Count of elements : 371 Compression mode : Lossless Stream size : 25.0 KiB (0%) Language : French Default : No Forced : No Text #6 ID : 8 Format : ASS Codec ID : S_TEXT/ASS Codec ID/Info : Advanced Sub Station Alpha Duration : 24 min 2 s Bit rate : 166 b/s Count of elements : 453 Compression mode : Lossless Stream size : 29.3 KiB (0%) Language : Italian Default : No Forced : No Text #7 ID : 9 Format : ASS Codec ID : S_TEXT/ASS Codec ID/Info : Advanced Sub Station Alpha Duration : 24 min 3 s Bit rate : 159 b/s Count of elements : 443 Compression mode : Lossless Stream size : 28.0 KiB (0%) Language : Portuguese Default : No Forced : No Text #8 ID : 10 Format : ASS Codec ID : S_TEXT/ASS Codec ID/Info : Advanced Sub Station Alpha Duration : 24 min 2 s Bit rate : 187 b/s Count of elements : 421 Compression mode : Lossless Stream size : 33.0 KiB (0%) Language : Russian Default : No Forced : No Source: CR WEB-DL

File list

  • [Arukoru] Go-Toubun no Hanayome (The Quintessential Quintuplets) - Episode 08 [1080p x265 10bit WEB Multi-Sub AAC].mkv (255.4 MiB)
@Arukoru; thanks! You saved the day once again! Also small question, do you remember asking how you re-enconding the shows? Well here is one small question I can't find the best way to equalize speed time and quality. I did some shows with veryfast preset as you told me, meaning under an hour per episode but now i was thinking doing at slower speed like medium the slow is way to slow for me the quality at 21 CRF what would be... The Veryfast, Faster, Fast, Medium? Have you seen any big difference in quality compare to the original source?? Thanks in advance!

Arukoru (uploader)

User
@Dark-Angel you're welcome, I have not seen a change in quality when just changing the speed, speed just really affects the file size from what I've seen. Between crf 21 and 20 not so much, when you go to 19 definitely better quality. I tested it by using mkvtoolnix to break up the episode into 20 second increments, then I took the biggest file sized increment and encoding that at different speeds and crf levels, then you can see rather quickly what does what. WEB-DL sources I don't put as much effort into because the source isn't very good to begin with but if you're dealing with a blu-ray source, definitely slower the better and I do crf 19 unless it was made 2008 or earlier. If earlier it comes out really big, the recent upload I did of berserk 1997 came out to 20 gb which was great compared to the 37 gb source but it didn't need crf 19 based on the animation quality, that was a mistake in my judgement, I could've done crf 21 and probably look just as good and be a much smaller size.

Arukoru (uploader)

User
@Dark-Angel I more did very fast setting on the web-dl stuff because I had so many episodes to do in so little time, it was a lot to take on as one person, if you want quality I'm sure slowing the speed will be better. But the main thing for quality is lowering the crf, crf 19 on very fast and crf 21 on very fast will look different, the crf 19 will look better but take longer even at the same speed setting.

Arukoru (uploader)

User
@Dark-Angel with web-dl's tho honestly your dealing with bad quality to begin with especially with audio, if you want the best you have to get access to the blu-ray. Web-dl episodes are only like 1.3 gb where a ripped blu-ray episode of the same show will be 4.5 gb, much better audio but all that data is not just audio.
@Arukoru; I am testing out from Horriblesubs the girly air force one the shows that i like i put my laptop enconding at crf 21 at medium preset constant framerate x265-10bit and the same video i just started enconding at my brother's laptop i7 HQ2860 2,5GHz Quad Core so for testing reason in quality i select the slow preset constant framerate x265-10bit at crf 21, will the quality may be better from the medium preset or the fast/faster etc?

Arukoru (uploader)

User
@Dark-Angel From what I've seen they should come out the same quality but the one on slow should be smaller than the one on medium

Arukoru (uploader)

User
@Dark-Angel it does also matter how good the computer is, so there is that but I think it will come out how I said it would based on my testing
@Arukoru; well my laptop is an AMD 2,5GHz Dual Core it's slower compare to the i7 Quad Core. But i didn't know that the hardware is also part of the quality equation. I thought that the better hardware the faster speed of processing each video and same quality.

Arukoru (uploader)

User
@Dark-Angel well we will see
@Arukoru; Hear something interesting. The Medium Preset Encnding Setings gave me 243 MB from Girly Air Force ep 8 with x265 20Bit Constant Frame Rate RF 21. Now the same epsode / file source from horirriblesubs that i did in the i7 Quad Core laptop withw the SLOW Enconding Presets the video file was 268 MB. So the SLOW preset gave me extra 25 MB. Interesting cause the slower the smaller file and better quality right? Also about quality and hardware. That ain't true after all. I check a 5 minutes video in both laptops the Dual Core AMD A6 2.5 GHz 4GB Ram with R2 AMD Graphics and the i7 2860QM Quad Core 2.50 GHz - 3.60 GHz 16GB Ram nVidia 650 2GB Dedicate. Both machines set to Medium Preset enconding, x265 10Bit Constant Framerate RF 21 the quality was the same and the same file size. I tried to see artifacts or dropped frames but they were excactly the same. I also checked 1 fast scene taking some screen shoots and watch the ditail in from both file in photoshop. They were the same. So the hardware don't do anything in the quality rather the speed of making the video.

Arukoru (uploader)

User
@Dark-Angel yeah that's weird, slower speed should be smaller size, yeah the crf will be the quality, the machine will only effect speed
@Arukoru; I am thinking starting making the Circlet Princess for my self And i download Eari's with the some nice subs for this show. So I wast thinking should i use the CRF 20 or 20,5 from handbrake are there gonna be any bigger file size? Or better image quality between CRF 21 that i am doing know and the 20 or 20,5? I will be doing them with Medum Enconding Presets. What is your option? Should i go for CRF 20 - 20,5 will be the same quality as the source? Even though it's a web rip?
@Arukoru; Also adding this line "strong-intra-smoothing=0:rect=0" at Extra Option big box i don't see something it was change at the final video / image. And after finishing a video enconding it gives me an Error - or a canceletion after adding this line and i can't find a clear answer what this line does...

Arukoru (uploader)

User
@Dark-Angel For me crf 20 did not give me a noticeable quality difference and the size did get bigger, if you want to play with more settings you should use a different program than handbrake, something like staxrip makes changing a variety settings easier. I like to keep it simple so I use handbrake these days, I used to use staxrip back in the day. As for the best settings to use I would just experiment and see what you like. That's really the only way.